Re: Cholesky factors of matrices which are not positive-definite
- From: Gordon Sande <g.sande@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:44:01 GMT
On 2006-08-30 14:18:18 -0300, "Murphy O'Brien" <murphyobrien@xxxxxxxxx> said:
I have heard it said regarding Cholesky factorisation, that :
"A symmetric matrix P is positive definite if and only if it has a
factorization P= L*L.' with a nonsingular lower triangular matrix."
Whet L.' is the transpose of L
P and L will be real matrices if you read the rest of the surrounding
material.
The extension to complex values will be for P Hermitian.
But that seems to only be true if one doesn't allow complex numbers.
e.g. the following matrix
P
1 1 -1
1 2 3
-1 3 6
is not positive definite becuase it has eigenvalues
-0.6977 2.0658 7.6319
but has a factorization L
1 0 0
1 1 0
-1 4 - 3.31662479035540i
where P=L*L.'
Where is the problem?
Quoting from incomplete context.
The quoted sentence above, or my interpretation of it, or my proof that
it's wrong.
Murphy
.
- References:
- Cholesky factors of matrices which are not positive-definite
- From: Murphy O'Brien
- Cholesky factors of matrices which are not positive-definite
- Prev by Date: Re: Large moving average
- Next by Date: Re: Large moving average
- Previous by thread: Cholesky factors of matrices which are not positive-definite
- Next by thread: Re: Cholesky factors of matrices which are not positive-definite
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|