Re: FIR Hilbert Transformer
- From: Tim Wescott <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:53:37 -0700
robert bristow-johnson wrote:
-- snip --
if the magnitude response
is not sufficiently constant, consider calling it a "crappy Hilbert
transformer".
Chuckle
if the magnitude response is approximately linear withDon't forget our friend the integrator!
frequency, consider calling it an approximation to a differentiator.
r b-j
--
Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/
"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April.
See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FIR Hilbert Transformer
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: FIR Hilbert Transformer
- References:
- FIR Hilber Transformer
- From: I. R. Khan
- Re: FIR Hilber Transformer
- From: Clay
- Re: FIR Hilber Transformer
- From: I. R. Khan
- Re: FIR Hilbert Transformer
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- FIR Hilber Transformer
- Prev by Date: Re: FIR Hilbert Transformer
- Next by Date: Re: A question about Covariance??
- Previous by thread: Re: FIR Hilbert Transformer
- Next by thread: Re: FIR Hilbert Transformer
- Index(es):