Re: dumb question: what is the antonym of "memoryless"?
- From: Eric Jacobsen <eric.jacobsen@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:06:43 -0700
On 27 Apr 2006 18:59:59 -0700, "robert bristow-johnson"
<rbj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i'm sure you can see the root to this question. "nonmemoryless" is a
double negative and clumsy.
when categorizing systems into dichotomies, we might have:
time-variant vs. time-invariant
linear vs. nonlinear
casual vs. acausal
???? vs. memoryless
what's the best word for this? what prefix means "having"? the
opposite of "sans"?
r b-j
Wow, long thread, no solution.
In the communications world channels are typically "memoryless" or
"multi-path".
The channel "memory" comes from some paths having longer propagation
delay than others, so in this context "multi-path" is the antonym for
"memoryless".
There are other mechanisms which can cause the same sort of thing,
like micro-reflections in cable plants, so I think the context may be
important.
Eric Jacobsen
Minister of Algorithms, Intel Corp.
My opinions may not be Intel's opinions.
http://www.ericjacobsen.org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dumb question: what is the antonym of "memoryless"?
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: dumb question: what is the antonym of "memoryless"?
- References:
- dumb question: what is the antonym of "memoryless"?
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- dumb question: what is the antonym of "memoryless"?
- Prev by Date: Re: Greg Berchin's filter design method
- Next by Date: Re: Greg Berchin's filter design method
- Previous by thread: Re: dumb question: what is the antonym of "memoryless"?
- Next by thread: Re: dumb question: what is the antonym of "memoryless"?
- Index(es):