Re: Odd length Hilbert FIR Implementation
- From: Jerry Avins <jya@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:21:33 -0500
Al Clark wrote:
...
The basic question is why does the hilbert filter with length 4i+1, for example 9 or 13 have better performance than a fir filter of length 4i-1, for example 7 or 11, even though the number of non zero coefficients is the same for the 4i+1 & 4i-1 filters. In the 4i+1 case, the first and last coefficients are zero, which allows the filter size to be reduced to a 4i-1 length.
The 4n+1 filter has two more points. It's just that the end two being zero allows you the efficiency of not including them in the computation. Try it with a low-pass. The same thing happens but it's harder to see in the plots. Unless the window includes a pedestal, windowed FIRs are always better with a window that's wider than the raw coefficients by two.
...
Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
.
- References:
- Odd length Hilbert FIR Implementation
- From: Al Clark
- Re: Odd length Hilbert FIR Implementation
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Odd length Hilbert FIR Implementation
- From: Al Clark
- Re: Odd length Hilbert FIR Implementation
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Odd length Hilbert FIR Implementation
- From: Al Clark
- Odd length Hilbert FIR Implementation
- Prev by Date: Reconstruction and interpolation from irregularly spaced data
- Next by Date: Re: Why translate center frequency (instead of band edge) to baseband?
- Previous by thread: Re: Odd length Hilbert FIR Implementation
- Next by thread: Clock Multiplication Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|