Re: Vector Rotation
- From: Martin Eisenberg <martin.eisenberg@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Feb 2006 19:46:47 GMT
Greg Berchin wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:07:27 -0500, Carlos Moreno
<moreno_at_mochima_dot_com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The only alternative that comes to mind (which does not mean
that it is the only alternative, of course) is to do binary
search on the magnitude -- or rather, on the scaling factor
for vector B required to obtain A'
Conceptually I like this idea. Even though it requires as many
stages as there are bits in the data word, its simplicity is
attractive.
Is there anything that rules out applying Newton-Raphson to the
resulting equation?
Martin
--
No wonder that illegitimate children are commonly
the greatest minds; they are the result of an hour
full of wit, marital ones often spring from boredom.
--Theodor Gottlieb von Hippel
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vector Rotation
- From: Greg Berchin
- Re: Vector Rotation
- References:
- Vector Rotation
- From: Greg Berchin
- Re: Vector Rotation
- From: Carlos Moreno
- Re: Vector Rotation
- From: Greg Berchin
- Vector Rotation
- Prev by Date: Re: VisualDSP++: How to tell compiler to place array in external memory?
- Next by Date: Re: Fourier Duality
- Previous by thread: Re: Vector Rotation
- Next by thread: Re: Vector Rotation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|