Re: FFT of non-integer waveform



Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use) wrote:
Hi Bob.

Wouldn't this only work if frequency was fixed, i.e. the phase
difference between adjacent samples is the same throughout the entire
cycle and the next sample of the following one?

Yes. If not fixed or without an integer number of samples per cycle, the conditions I qualified my comment with don't obtain.


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."

A. Einstein
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Simple versus formal proof?
    ... Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use) wrote: ... Mohab is completely wrong here. ... It's quite a sweet proof, and every bit as valid as the "k or k+1 must be..." ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Simple versus formal proof?
    ... Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use) wrote: ... Depends on who you're writing for. ... how to fill in the gaps". ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: WAV to PCM conversion
    ... Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use) wrote: ... Do you suppose there will ever be a floating-point ADC? ... Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. ...
    (comp.dsp)
  • Re: Another silly question
    ... Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use) wrote: ... the margin of any page for an integer triple such that ...
    (sci.math)