Re: Anthropomorphisms and the inherent periodicity of the DFT
- From: Stan Pawlukiewicz <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:58:36 -0500
Fred Marshall wrote:
"Stan Pawlukiewicz" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dq3u8h$nan$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
robert bristow-johnson wrote:
(big snip)
s" that the data
passed to it is one period of a discrete, infinite, and periodic sequence of numbers that has period length of N.
i fail to see this as a misuse of the language to make a point and to say "The DFT is not a living creature so it cannot make assumptions..." fails to refute the point i make about the inherent periodic extension of data made by the DFT.
You really don't make the point either. I've read the periodic extension perspective in Brigham's FFT book, but I have never seen it in in any book that talks about Sturm Louville boundary value problems. There is nothing that makes the periodic extension principle more fundamental than the filter bank perspective,the orthogonal decomposition perspective, or the sampling of the Z transform on the unit circle perspective. It might make circular convolution a bit more intuitive but it really just confuses the hell of people when you present the overlap add method of filtering, and is kind of tangential when you start talking about statistical spectral estimation.
Stan,
I thought I was following you here but then lost it at the end.
Are for neutral or for .... which convention?
Fred
in this post tangential= irrelevant.
I don't believe any are wrong, given the context of the signal. If a signal is actually periodic and matched to the sample rate so that the discrete sequence repeats itself, periodical extension of a single period is fine with me. I think the Z transform perspective is the most fundamental for a finite sequence.
.
- References:
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: stevenj
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: John Monro
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: John Monro
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: Rick Lyons
- Anthropomorphisms and the inherent periodicity of the DFT
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: Anthropomorphisms and the inherent periodicity of the DFT
- From: Stan Pawlukiewicz
- Re: Anthropomorphisms and the inherent periodicity of the DFT
- From: Fred Marshall
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- Prev by Date: Re: Chebyshev IIR - cutoff frequency 0.5 leads to distortion?
- Next by Date: Recycling FFTs
- Previous by thread: Re: Anthropomorphisms and the inherent periodicity of the DFT
- Next by thread: Re: Anthropomorphisms and the inherent periodicity of the DFT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|