Re: reconstruction filter
- From: "Bhaskar Thiagarajan" <bhaskart@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:38:22 -0800
"maxascent" <johnbean_uk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:sNydnc7WcdM4k1neRVn-tg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi
>
> I want to design a filter after a dac for a dds system. It will be a
> passive 9th order elliptic filter. Problem is I want to add a circuit to
> compensate for the sinx/x of the dac.
Wow, 9th order filter. That must end being pretty big.
You can pre-compensate for the sinx/x of the DAC in the digital data before
you send it out the DAC. That way, your output data will not have the sinx/x
distortion and you can avoid some analog headache in trying to create a
circuit.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reconstruction filter
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: reconstruction filter
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: reconstruction filter
- References:
- reconstruction filter
- From: maxascent
- reconstruction filter
- Prev by Date: Re: reconstruction filter
- Next by Date: Re: BER performance of Viterbi decoder
- Previous by thread: Re: reconstruction filter
- Next by thread: Re: reconstruction filter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|