Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: John Monro <johnmonro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:38:18 +1100
Jerry Avins wrote:
John Monro wrote:
...
You point out that the DFT, and the integration you describe, each produce only numbers, not equations. This supports my position that the DFT and the Fourier Series can not be regarded as the same thing. Jerry, I am not entirely sure what your position is on this specific point.
My point is that /neither/ the DFT /nor/ the classic computation of the Fourier series' coefficients by integration produce a Fourier series per se, and that /both/ computations produce the same numbers and nothing else. If I haven't established that, there's little to be gained from discussing its implications.
Jerry
Jerry,
I am in total agreement with you, and was only looking for clarification.
Regards, John .
- References:
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: stevenj
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: John Monro
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- Prev by Date: Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- Next by Date: Re: Computed Power Range Does Not Match Spectrum Analyzer
- Previous by thread: Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- Next by thread: Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|