Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: Jerry Avins <jya@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 10:04:17 -0500
John Monro wrote:
...
The essential difference is that the Fourier series is a function of time, and the DFT isn't. I know this is obvious to all concerned, but we are talking about definitions here, I think. As I see it the DFT provides the coefficients, but this set of coefficients becomes a Fourier series only when you attach all the appropriate cos and sin functions.
I haven't time to check back now, But I believe that I wrote that the DFT finds the coefficients of the Fourier series, not the series itself. If I wrote otherwise, I was wrong (as a definition).
Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: John Monro
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- References:
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: stevenj
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- From: John Monro
- Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- Prev by Date: Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- Next by Date: Re: DSP resources
- Previous by thread: Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- Next by thread: Re: Zero Padding in radix 2 FFT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|