Re: OT: Evidence
- From: Andrew Reilly <andrew-newspost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:24:49 +1100
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:22:16 -0500, Stan Pawlukiewicz wrote:
> What about dark matter in astronomy?
Interestingly, I read recently that some guys had figured out that they
can make "dark matter" go away by making a more accurate cosmological
model, based on relativistic mechanics, rather than Neutonian.
It's not my field, so I don't know if they've been shown to have made an
error or not, yet, but it seemed like a pretty neat piece of work, to an
outsider.
--
Andrew
.
- References:
- Re: OT: Evidence
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: OT: Evidence
- From: Eric Jacobsen
- Re: OT: Evidence
- From: gold
- Re: OT: Evidence
- From: jim
- Re: OT: Evidence
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: OT: Evidence
- From: jim
- Re: OT: Evidence
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: OT: Evidence
- From: Stan Pawlukiewicz
- Re: OT: Evidence
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: OT: Evidence
- From: Stan Pawlukiewicz
- Re: OT: Evidence
- From: Stan Pawlukiewicz
- Re: OT: Evidence
- From: Rune Allnor
- Re: OT: Evidence
- From: Stan Pawlukiewicz
- Re: OT: Evidence
- Prev by Date: Re: C values that are not known at compile time
- Next by Date: Re: Approximating log(x+1/x)
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Evidence
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Evidence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|