Re: inverse laplace transform
- From: Tim Wescott <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:42:29 -0800
Bhaskar Thiagarajan wrote:
You can have an any-order (up to infinite) differential equation that is linear. The order of the diff. eq and it's linearity are orthogonal properties."Tim Wescott" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:wYGdnbPA6obFKjTe4p2dnA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bhaskar Thiagarajan wrote:
Hi all
I'm working on trying to model a non-linear system (described by a
second
order differential eqn) into a discrete IIR filter.
Whoa! Stop right there!
The Laplace transform (and the z transform) only work with linear systems. You simply cannot do a Laplace transform of a nonlinear system: it doesn't work. You can dink with Volterra series and all that fun stuff, but then you're not really doing a Laplace any more.
Hmm...I think I mis-spoke. My instinct tells me that a second order differential equation is non-linear. However, I just looked up the Rick Lyons' book and I see that he calls it a linear system. I'm just going to take his word for it for now and revisit it later.
You may want to do a bit of digging and remind yourself of the properties of linearity and time-invariance (they are two different properties). The Laplace transform only works on systems that are linear and time invariant. The z transform only works on systems that are linear and who's time variance is cyclical at the reference rate.
If you're clever and determined you can use Fourier analysis on some systems that are time varying, like systems with sampling and superheterodyne radio receivers.
--
Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com .
- References:
- inverse laplace transform
- From: Bhaskar Thiagarajan
- Re: inverse laplace transform
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: inverse laplace transform
- From: Bhaskar Thiagarajan
- inverse laplace transform
- Prev by Date: Re: inverse laplace transform
- Next by Date: Re: C values that are not known at compile time
- Previous by thread: Re: inverse laplace transform
- Next by thread: Re: inverse laplace transform
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|