Re: variance vs mean square error
- From: Jani Huhtanen <jani.huhtanen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:09:30 +0200
robert bristow-johnson wrote:
>
> Jani Huhtanen wrote:
>> John wrote:
>>
>> > the mean square error _is_ - as far as I know - the variance of the
>> > error...
>>
>> Actually mean square error is sample variance which in turn is just an
>> estimator for the true variance. Sample variance is "accurate" if the
>> noise is white noise, but generally one should take the probability
>> distribution into account.
>
> it's a semantic issue i guess, but even given the meaning of "sample
> variance" taken from the Wolfram link, i am not sure what you mean by
> "accurate", Jani.
By "accurate" I meant that sample variance is close to the population
variance when P(x_i) is equal for all x_i. Only that we don't know the
sample mean. Assuming we know that we have zero mean noise with equal
P(x_i) for all x_i then sample variance is population variance. Then again
I might be wrong...
--
Jani Huhtanen
Tampere University of Technology, Pori
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: variance vs mean square error
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: variance vs mean square error
- References:
- variance vs mean square error
- From: sdeepa
- Re: variance vs mean square error
- From: John
- Re: variance vs mean square error
- From: Jani Huhtanen
- Re: variance vs mean square error
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- variance vs mean square error
- Prev by Date: Re: Working in Singapore
- Next by Date: Re: variance vs mean square error
- Previous by thread: Re: variance vs mean square error
- Next by thread: Re: variance vs mean square error
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|