Re: variance vs mean square error
- From: "robert bristow-johnson" <rbj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Nov 2005 12:41:25 -0800
Jani Huhtanen wrote:
> John wrote:
>
> > the mean square error _is_ - as far as I know - the variance of the
> > error...
>
> Actually mean square error is sample variance which in turn is just an
> estimator for the true variance. Sample variance is "accurate" if the noise
> is white noise, but generally one should take the probability distribution
> into account.
it's a semantic issue i guess, but even given the meaning of "sample
variance" taken from the Wolfram link, i am not sure what you mean by
"accurate", Jani. the sample variance (divide by N) is less accurate
than the unbiased estimator (divide by N-1 instead of N) for getting to
the "population variance" which is the variance in the p.d.f. this is
true whether tha r.v. is white or not.
r b-j
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: variance vs mean square error
- From: Jani Huhtanen
- Re: variance vs mean square error
- References:
- variance vs mean square error
- From: sdeepa
- Re: variance vs mean square error
- From: John
- Re: variance vs mean square error
- From: Jani Huhtanen
- variance vs mean square error
- Prev by Date: Re: Building a (cheap) software radio
- Next by Date: Re: Building a (cheap) software radio
- Previous by thread: Re: variance vs mean square error
- Next by thread: Re: variance vs mean square error
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|