Re: Rant on "Some thoughts abouth thinking"
- From: mojaveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Everett M. Greene)
32.3144@trnddc06> <i3E4f.881$S24.53121@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <HOL4f.130695$G8.65973@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <yqM4f.1020$S24.59291@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <nbm5f.7338$Yk6.3357@trnddc01> <rIq5f.1423$S24.92319@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <vmG5f.8319$W32.368@trnddc06> <85N5f.1615$S24.109201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fEj6f.1137$i31.908@trnddc08> <Suz6f.135101$G8.118072@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-NewsReader: GRn 3.2n February 9, 1999
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: none that you'd notice
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:47:14 PST
Message-ID: <20051023.7A46F70.1190E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Lines: 32
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.77.199.11
X-Trace: sv3-6DYzzTvgRGeGj6nV1XL5rnJDKfIMVINMCvz0tGpHtiH7Wtstl4qCTRk/LWOKJBks5k1uUrEmU6Z5Ig6!fkJflwHWmRN+uwEwIuBQ4UwvzgEY7+KAo+0hBeDYvfQqdnOoEB4jjUSuSpMTSBFkqKhZavDL6D/Q!pLgNdGA=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Path: mail.derkeiler.com!drt1!artnm!t2!feeder.news-service.com!217.19.16.137.MISMATCH!feeder2.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.iwvisp.com!news.iwvisp.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Xref: mail.derkeiler.com comp.dsp:179504
Richard Dobson <richarddobson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Jon Harris wrote:
> >
> >>It's true that the molecules required for human life (or any life) are quite
> >>complicated. However they are still all derived from very simple atomic
> >>building blocks, and can be assembled in pieces over time.
> >
> > Yes, if you get all the exact right pieces together in one place at one time.
> > One scientist estimated that the probability of this happening randomly was
> > 10^-125!
But there's probably been 10^125+ opportunities for any
particular event to occur so does that make the probability
of any of them greater than 1?
> Is that the probability of it happening on just this planet, or anywhere in the
> Unvierse? If the latter, thats a probability applied to a pretty large space,
> over a pretty large timescale, which to my mind makes the chance of it happening
> once, somewhere, pretty high, and the chance of it happening independently in at
> least two places still high. Panspermia, etc. What I have never been clear
> about is whether the Creationists are considering this planet alone, or "in
> principle" the whole Universe (i.e would they be freaked out by discovery of
> life elsewhere?). Currently we only have evidence from this planet (whether for
> evolution or God), which does not discount the possibility of evidence elsewhere
> which we simply haven't found yet. In terms of the Universe (well, this Universe
> anyway), might even this whole planet maybe represent a sample set too small to
> derive reliable preditions?
Ah, the hazards of extrapolation from a single data
point! You can use your data to "prove" anything you
want but you have a very high probability of being
totally wrong.
.
- References:
- OT: Some thoughts abouth thinking
- From: Rune Allnor
- Re: OT: Some thoughts abouth thinking
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: OT: Some thoughts abouth thinking
- From: Rune Allnor
- Re: OT: Some thoughts abouth thinking
- From: Richard Owlett
- Re: OT: Some thoughts abouth thinking
- From: Eric Jacobsen
- Re: OT: Some thoughts abouth thinking
- From: Richard Owlett
- Re: OT: Some thoughts abouth thinking
- From: Eric Jacobsen
- Re: OT: Some thoughts abouth thinking
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: OT: Some thoughts abouth thinking
- From: Eric Jacobsen
- Rant on "Some thoughts abouth thinking"
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Rant on "Some thoughts abouth thinking"
- From: Jon Harris
- Re: Rant on "Some thoughts abouth thinking"
- From: Jerry Avins
- OT: Some thoughts abouth thinking
- Prev by Date: Spatial and temporal diversity
- Next by Date: Re: Taps
- Previous by thread: Re: Rant on "Some thoughts abouth thinking"
- Next by thread: Re: Rant on "Some thoughts abouth thinking"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading