Re: CIC Group Delay
- From: R.Lyons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rick Lyons)
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 01:54:22 GMT
On 19 Oct 2005 20:24:54 GMT, Martin Eisenberg
<martin.eisenberg@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>jim_nospam_beasley@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> But I don't see how to take advantage of the Noble Identity that
>> is obtained in the Hogenauer method. The advantage I am refering
>> to is the reduction of memory requirements by decimating
>> immediately after the integrator.
>
>If your word width allows for multiple integration, you could push
>the comb filters in at least the last few CIC blocks to the end of
>the chain and run them all at the output sample rate.
>
>
>Martin
>
>--
>Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
Hi Martin,
just out of curiosity, what does
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur."
mean in English?
Thanks,
[-Rick-]
.
- References:
- CIC Group Delay
- From: jim_nospam_beasley
- Re: CIC Group Delay
- From: Bob Cain
- Re: CIC Group Delay
- From: Rick Lyons
- Re: CIC Group Delay
- From: Bob Cain
- Re: CIC Group Delay
- From: jim_nospam_beasley
- Re: CIC Group Delay
- From: Martin Eisenberg
- CIC Group Delay
- Prev by Date: Re: Can you give examples of a system that is LTI?
- Next by Date: Re: Correction for: Interpolating function with two important characteristics
- Previous by thread: Re: CIC Group Delay
- Next by thread: Re: CIC Group Delay
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|