Re: DAC requirement for carrier generation
- From: spope33@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Steve Pope)
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:25:15 +0000 (UTC)
Steve Underwood <steveu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Steve Pope wrote:
>>The real question is, could you get by at Fs/3 for the center
>>frequency? Or must it be lower still?
>I'm not sure it even makes theoretical sense, considering the sinc
>rolloff that close to the end of the band (or do theoretician's DACs
>output dirac pulses :-) ).
The sinc rolloff is only 3 dB at Fs/2 so it's not a deal-killer.
>Fs/3 can be workable, but a lot depends on the spur performance of the
>DAC, and a hundred other messy details.
Yep.
S.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DAC requirement for carrier generation
- From: langwadt
- Re: DAC requirement for carrier generation
- References:
- DAC requirement for carrier generation
- From: Snowball
- Re: DAC requirement for carrier generation
- From: Paul Solomon
- Re: DAC requirement for carrier generation
- From: Steve Underwood
- DAC requirement for carrier generation
- Prev by Date: Re: Osculating/Hermite Interpolation on sampled data
- Next by Date: Re: SNR Question
- Previous by thread: Re: DAC requirement for carrier generation
- Next by thread: Re: DAC requirement for carrier generation
- Index(es):