Re: Frequency domain filtering (rectangular window question)
- From: Jerry Avins <jya@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:45:32 -0400
Bob Cain wrote:
...
"Bin" is a terrible misnomer for frequency domain samples which continues to persist for some reason.
I agree, but I use it for lack of a better concise term. "Sample of the Underlying Continuous Spectrum" could give us SUCS, but people would construe it as plural. Besides, that's not the whole story except in filters.
Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ .
- References:
- Re: Frequency domain filtering (rectangular window question)
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: Frequency domain filtering (rectangular window question)
- From: tjuii
- Re: Frequency domain filtering (rectangular window question)
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: Frequency domain filtering (rectangular window question)
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Frequency domain filtering (rectangular window question)
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Frequency domain filtering (rectangular window question)
- From: tjuii
- Re: Frequency domain filtering (rectangular window question)
- From: Bob Cain
- Re: Frequency domain filtering (rectangular window question)
- Prev by Date: About DFT
- Next by Date: Re: About DFT
- Previous by thread: Re: Frequency domain filtering (rectangular window question)
- Next by thread: Re: Frequency domain filtering (rectangular window question)
- Index(es):
Loading