Re: Hilbert transform using FFT approach
- From: Al Clark <dsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:08:14 GMT
Jerry Avins <jya@xxxxxxxx> wrote in news:Pv6dneqMBPQ6S6zeRVn-gg@xxxxxxx:
> Al Clark wrote:
>> Jerry Avins <jya@xxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> news:DNqdnTN5Vq4ZM6zenZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@xxxxxxx:
>>
>>
>>>w106pjs wrote:
>>>
>>>>>w106pjs wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>The purpose [of the quadrature signals] is to generate the
>>>>>>envelope of
>>>>
>>>>the real
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>sequence of data using the analytic signal approach using the FFT
>>>>
>>>>approach
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Then you don't want the phase distortion that comes with
>>>>>computationally
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>cheaper ways. If the frequencies that in the envelope lie in a
>>>>>relatively narrow band around the carrier, and the sample rate is
>>>>>high enough to reproduce the carrier, then it sounds quite doable.
>>>>>Narrow-band HTs aren't too hard. Do you have Matlab or anything
>>>>>like it?
>>>>>
>>>>>Where does the FFT fit in? Given quadrature signals I[n] and Q[n],
>>>>>the envelope is E[n] = sqrt(I[n]^2 + Q[n]^2]. There are decent
>>>>>approximations for the square root of the sum of squares.
>>>>>
>>>>>Jerry
>>>>>--
>>>>>Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can
>>>>>get.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Jerry,
>>>>
>>>>what I meant is Hilbert function in MATLAB uses fft approach in
>>>>generating the analytic signal.
>>>>Is that similar approach implementable in real time. ?
>>>>FYI
>>>>Fsig = 240khz, Fs = 10 Mhz..
>>>
>>>A Hilbert transformer can be just an antisymmetric FIR with alternate
>>>taps zero and the other coefficients inversely proportional to the
>>>tap's distance from the center. If the number of taps is odd, there's
>>>a bonus in that the signal at the center tap (which must be zero for
>>>the FT) is the delayed version of the input without the quadrature
>>>shift. Neither an extra delay line nor half-period delay are needed.
>>>But thinking more on it, the possibly cheaper filter pair with
>>>relatively quadrature outputs ought to work also with negligible
>>>distortion unless the modulating waveform is wide compared to the
>>>carrier.
>>>
>>>Jerry
>>
>>
>> The alternate taps are not always 0. This is true (or perhaps tends
>> to be true) for window based designs of Hilbert transformers. If you
>> use the PM (remez exchange) method, you will have values at all taps
>> except the middle coefficient for an odd length FIR filter. The
>> coefficients will always be antisymmetric.
>>
>> The reason to use remez exchange vs windowing methods is that
>> although the phase will always be exactly 90 degrees apart if the FIR
>> filter is antisymmetric, the amplitude response will have errors in
>> the passband (the filter will be bandpass). You can make the the
>> passband very flat with the remez exchange method. This makes your 0
>> and 90 degree outputs a nearly perfect pair (as long as you are in
>> the passbamd of the FIR) It many cases, you have plenty of MIPS for
>> the additional non zero calculations. The length of the FIR filter
>> needs to be long enough to accommodate the lowest frequency of
>> interest. If you want a 90 phase shift of DC, it would take a FIR
>> filter with infinite taps (it would have a very long group delay as
>> well).
>
> In my limited experience, if a longer filter is no problem, windowed
> filters can execute faster. Although they have longer delay lines, one
> can step through them with a stride of two. I found that a Nuttall
> window worked very well.
>
> Jerry
Clearly, an advantage of the windowed filters is that you can use a
filter of twice the length for the same computation cost (and twice the
group delay).
This is a good illustration of "there's no free lunch" principle. It's
always about balancing one choice against another.
--
Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Purveyors of Fine DSP Hardware and other Cool Stuff
Available at http://www.danvillesignal.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hilbert transform using FFT approach
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: Hilbert transform using FFT approach
- References:
- Hilbert transform using FFT approach
- From: w106pjs
- Re: Hilbert transform using FFT approach
- From: w106pjs
- Re: Hilbert transform using FFT approach
- From: Al Clark
- Re: Hilbert transform using FFT approach
- From: Jerry Avins
- Hilbert transform using FFT approach
- Prev by Date: used Accelchip tool
- Next by Date: OFDM Help
- Previous by thread: Re: Hilbert transform using FFT approach
- Next by thread: Re: Hilbert transform using FFT approach
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading