Re: Hilbert Transformer
- From: Jerry Avins <jya@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:21:50 -0400
Max Hauser wrote:
"Shytot" in news:RvvQe.6754$iM2.671366@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: | I have a Hilbert transformer...but I cannot figure out which | is the primary and secondary windings never mind the VA ...
Where was this guy when we needed him here, in 1991.
http://tinyurl.com/3o852
(Note the first proposed solution)
Follow-up:
http://tinyurl.com/4kfch
And where were YOU, Max, when I tried to defend the proposition that relative phase has strict meaning only between signals of the same frequency, and that even when used loosely, the concept needs an agreed-upon meaning that will not be the same in all circumstances.
Jerry -- Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get. ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hilbert Transformer
- From: Max Hauser
- Re: Hilbert Transformer
- References:
- Re: Hilbert Transformer
- From: Max Hauser
- Re: Hilbert Transformer
- Prev by Date: adding up coefficients
- Next by Date: Re: Windowed-sinc function
- Previous by thread: Re: Hilbert Transformer
- Next by thread: Re: Hilbert Transformer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|