Re: Hilbert Transformer
- From: "Clay S. Turner" <Physics@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:28:26 -0400
"John Monro" <johnmonro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4314184E.1090007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shytot wrote:
>> "Jerry Avins" <jya@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:vfmdnZP4gfor947eRVn-2w@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>Jon Harris wrote:
>>>
>>>>Is this a joke?
>>>
>>>No. It's a troll.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Though quite a well edukated one you will agree...
>>
>>
>> Shytot
>>
>>
>
> Definitely the most edukated troll I have seen.
>
> Actually I was hoping that someone might know why the algorithms that do
> the Fourier Transform, the Laplace Transform and so on are not called
> Fourier Transformers, Laplace Transformers etc.
>
> Why is it that in popular usage only the Hilbert Transform has a
> Transformer?
>
Hello John,
Well this is a guess, but the Hilbert transform unlike the others you
mentioned has the output in the same domain as the input. So it has this in
common with a transformer.
Clay
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hilbert Transformer
- From: Bob Cain
- Re: Hilbert Transformer
- References:
- Hilbert Transformer
- From: Shytot
- Re: Hilbert Transformer
- From: Jon Harris
- Re: Hilbert Transformer
- From: Jerry Avins
- Re: Hilbert Transformer
- From: Shytot
- Re: Hilbert Transformer
- From: John Monro
- Hilbert Transformer
- Prev by Date: Re: What is the lowest power dsp ?
- Next by Date: Re: Feedforward Blind Symbol Recovery
- Previous by thread: Re: Hilbert Transformer
- Next by thread: Re: Hilbert Transformer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|