Re: Busy out POTS line
- From: floyd@xxxxxxxxxx (Floyd L. Davidson)
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:29:38 -0900
Justa Lurker <JustaLurker@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
>> David Lesher <wb8foz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>Ian <ian610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>You could forward your calls to an alway busy number, I suppose.
>> And if there is a problem with having a phone setting there
>> offhook,
>
>The only "problem" I could see would be having to listen to the
>loud "hailer" tones (at least I always heard it called by that
A "howler".
Which is indeed intended to be the most annoying possible noise
that can legally be sent over a telephone line... :-)
>name) which many switches seem to put on a line which has gone
>off-hook but not completed a call after some brief period of
>time. Presumably this is to alert the subsciber that his
>handset had been accidentally [or otherwise] knocked off the
>cradle and incoming callers would receive a busy (not to mention
>that the offhook but idle line was wastefully tying up switch
>resources, like a linefinder, particularly in the older
>electromechanical COs) ?
Older mechanical things no longer exist! Some of them also had
the nasty habit of locking out the line for a *long* time after
it was back onhook.
>> it is a simple matter of wiring a switch across the
>> line to busy it out (and make the phone dead as a door nail)
>> when the switch is closed, and (just as when the phone is put
>> back onhook) service is restored within seconds of flipping the
>> switch to open.
>>
>
>This should basically be fine, but IIRC (am I'm not sure I do),
>aren't there some switches which generate trouble reports,
They all generate a log message of some kind, but anybody who
doesn't have those sent to the bit bucket deserves the piles
of paper/time wasted looking at them.
>require some sort of manual intervention to restore service once
>the line has gone back on-hook, etc. ? Or do they just remove
I don't think any of them would do that today, though of course
there could be.
>battery after a period of time has elapsed, and automatically
>restore everything back to normal once the loop has gone on-hook
>(e.g., opened) again for some predetermined length of time
>[which presumably is what you meant when you wrote "restored
>within seconds of flipping the switch to open" ? Just curious.
They probably don't even remove the loop current, but just
monitor it. The only switch I have access to these days
restores my service in less than 2 seconds.
>Also, I would make darn sure that the switch were in a prominent
>location and clearly labeled so that someone else could use the
>phone in an emergency if the OP were not present, incapacitated,
>etc.
That's a *really good* idea!
--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@xxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Busy out POTS line
- From: Ian
- Re: Busy out POTS line
- From: David Lesher
- Re: Busy out POTS line
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: Busy out POTS line
- From: Justa Lurker
- Busy out POTS line
- Prev by Date: Re: Busy out POTS line
- Next by Date: Re: Busy out POTS line
- Previous by thread: Re: Busy out POTS line
- Next by thread: Re: Busy out POTS line
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading