Re: Measuring VLAN performance



On Jun 8, 7:17 am, "Gerard Gallagher" <gallaghe...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,

I'm in the process of converting a flat network (approx 2000 users) to a
more layered approach using VLANS.
We have 2x Cisco 6509 switches with Sup720's configured as a HSRP core,
linked with a l3 etherchannel, and an l2 etherchannel.

Each closet will comprise 3 vlans - one for voice, one for data and VLAN1
for management.

I would like to know how the addition of vlans is affecting the overall
network - i.e as areas come off vlan1 for user traffic and get moved to
their respective vlan how the overall network performance is hopefully
improving, and I'm looking for any information that would help me measure
this, or indeed any aspect of the network which I should be measuring. The
idea is to be able to show how the vlan introduction is helping the site.

Many thanks in advance.

Regards,
Ger

To be honest, you shouldn't see much benefit or disadvantage to the
change in architecture. Presuming your old config was a single vlan,
the only traffic that will be greatly reduced is broadcast
traffic...but for 2000 nodes.....not a big deal on a gig or multi-gig
network. In the old config, nodes off closet 1 would broadcast for
any of the other 2000 nodes, but the traffic itself would only go
between source and destination (within the closet or to another
closet, etc). Now the nodes will only arp within the same closet,
greatly reducing broadcasts across the core. To be honest, all you
are doing is enabling the routing on the 6500s which will now control
traffic between vlans, when before, they probably only controlled
ingress/egress to the single vlan. So you are definitely doing the
right thing in terms of scalability, but I doubt you will see any
major performance increase...unless you had slower links or some major
load that would drive broadcasts...but arp/cam timers should limit
that impact.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: To vlan or not to vlan, thats the question
    ... > divide the network in two, ... Unless you will now or in the near future implement vlans there is no ... routers to route traffic _between_ different vlans as well as switches ... opposed to conventional switching. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: VLAN Help
    ... clear how your network is setted up. ... the remote office LAN and add a port which will connect to this LAN ... Once you do that you have to add a tagged port to the 2 VLANS (yours ... > Our network center runs the same switch but the Layer 3 Version. ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: Single domain two IP subnets
    ... hardware or any of the complexities of "network hardward ... I never criticize anyone's typing as long as the words can ... Cisco ISL VLANS are history. ... Newer Cisco switches don't even support ISL ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.dns)
  • RE: VMS cluster behind a *NIX firewall
    ... Can you explain why you think you need a "separate network?" ... You have a 100MB network. ... Of course you get three 100mbs networks with three VLANS. ... you will *get* full bandwidth on each port until you ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: Windows XP systems on a particular VLAN cannot be seen
    ... Browsing has nothing to do with DNS. ... pointing to a WINS server which was in a cluster. ... Network Places is not "live",...it is just reading the data from a ... sitting on several VLANs cannot be seen under My Network Places. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)