Re: A QoS dscp question
- From: fugettaboutit <no@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:22:09 GMT
News Reader wrote:
Well, see, that's the thing. I read the RFC and it seemed a little
ambiguous. I have the CiscoPress ONT book, and it's adamant that AF4x
vs. AF1x is simply a class distinction. I always thought the same as you
that there was indeed a difference. Now, if you use the DSCP class
selector (CS1 - 7), then yes, those matter as they'd be processed by
non-DSCP compliant nodes.
I'd love to find a clear explanation of the AF classes. As I said, I
didn't come away from the RFC with a much better understanding. The
Cisco ONT book is the "clearest" one I've seen so far... :-)
Try these:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk543/tk759/technologies_white_paper0900aecd80295abf.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6558/ps6610/product_data_sheet0900aecd8031b36d.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk543/tk766/technologies_white_paper09186a00800a3e2f.pdf
Best Regards,
News Reader
Correct...I meant 3 drop probabilities and 4 classes!
Thanks for the links. I'll take a look at them for myself.
.
- References:
- A QoS dscp question
- From: aaabbb16
- Re: A QoS dscp question
- From: fugettaboutit
- Re: A QoS dscp question
- From: aaabbb16
- Re: A QoS dscp question
- From: fugettaboutit
- Re: A QoS dscp question
- From: News Reader
- A QoS dscp question
- Prev by Date: Re: SMTP and tcp ports
- Next by Date: Re: A QoS dscp question
- Previous by thread: Re: A QoS dscp question
- Next by thread: Re: A QoS dscp question
- Index(es):