Re: Switch w/ VLANs at the Edge Question
- From: tman <naves.tom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:16:26 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 19, 3:16 pm, Trendkill <jpma...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 19, 5:02 pm, tman <naves....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 19, 11:57 am, Trendkill <jpma...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 19, 12:56 pm, tman <naves....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have several switches in my public network each connecting two or
three devices on seperate networks. I thought it would be a good idea
to consolidate them into one switch with a VLAN for each network with
no interVLAN routing. I can't find any information that I can
understand. I was wondering if anyone does this and how to make it
secure.
Thanks.
Essentially you are talking about creating the vlans centrally, using
VTP to propagate out the VLANs, using your existing routers to service
those networks (or perhaps consolidate those as well to a central l3
switch or router). This isn't that difficult, and it depends if you
are consolidating onto a catalyst or ios based switch for config
references. You also would need to control 'security' at the
routers. If you don't want traffic between subnets, you'll need to
ensure that you aren't advertising the networks between you routers,
or you have access-control lists if you are routing centrally.
My plan is to use one switch that has one VLAN to connect every pair
of devices. Each pair of devices is in on a separate network. Each
port will be configured as an access port e.g. switchport mode
access. There will be no connections from this switch to any other
switches, thus no need for trunks. I am replacing several small
switches. The switch is a Catalyst switch with IOS.
Your comments will be welcomed.
Thanks
Well, you can't use one vlan to merge layer 3 networks. I guess
technically you can have one vlan, and the boxes will only be able to
talk to other boxes in the same layer 3 address range, but all boxes
would see broadcasts, etc, and it would be very bad practice.
Additionally, if you ever need to route externally, this could get
very very nasty. Perhaps I misunderstood your requirements, but I
would connect all boxes to the switch, create vlans for each subnet,
and lets the router(s) control security via ACLs.
If this is indeed not routing anywhere else, you can look into vlan
security, and use things like private vlans. Generally this is for
nodes that are all in the same layer 3 network, but you want to
protect them from one another and only allow communications within a
group or with the gateway. Here is a link.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=29803&seqNum=6- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
This is a simplified view of what I have now:
Three Seperate Networks, three separate switches:
Router1 ----- Switch1 ------ Router2
Router3 ----- Switch2 ------ Router4
Router5 ----- Switch3 ------ Router6
What I Would Like to do if it is a good idea:
Three separate networks, one switch with three vlans that do not
communicate with each other..
Router1 ----- Switch1, vlan1 ------ Router2
Router3 ----- Switch1, vlan2 ------ Router4
Router5 ----- Switch1, vlan3 ------ Router6
Thus replacing three separate switches with one switch
There are no routing protocols. The routers do not know about one
another.
Is this feasable? Is it secure?
Thanks
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Switch w/ VLANs at the Edge Question
- From: Trendkill
- Re: Switch w/ VLANs at the Edge Question
- References:
- Switch w/ VLANs at the Edge Question
- From: tman
- Re: Switch w/ VLANs at the Edge Question
- From: Trendkill
- Re: Switch w/ VLANs at the Edge Question
- From: tman
- Re: Switch w/ VLANs at the Edge Question
- From: Trendkill
- Switch w/ VLANs at the Edge Question
- Prev by Date: odd BGP Problem
- Next by Date: I keep losing connection to the internet
- Previous by thread: Re: Switch w/ VLANs at the Edge Question
- Next by thread: Re: Switch w/ VLANs at the Edge Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|