Re: Cisco 857 and 877 routers



Ewan McNab schrieb:
Hi all

Could anyone say what the differences are between the 857 and 877 routers? We have up till now used the 837 router and PC World Business have said the 857 was the replacement, but on looking at the Cisco website they are saying the 877 is the replacement for the 837.

The main thing we need from the new routers are the ability to have a site-to-site VPN between head office, and two remote sites, possibly a 3rd, and also 4 or 5 remote users using a VPN client. Hard to say how many remote users could be connected at the one time.

If you are happy with a 837 with k9o3y Feature Set, you may happy with the 857 which is advsecurity only.

If you needed features from PLUS Feature Set, you may need the 877 which offers advipservices.

The performance of 857 is still above the 837.

--
Uli
.



Relevant Pages

  • Cisco 857 and 877 routers
    ... We have up till now used the 837 router and PC World Business have said the 857 was the replacement, but on looking at the Cisco website they are saying the 877 is the replacement for the 837. ... The main thing we need from the new routers are the ability to have a site-to-site VPN between head office, and two remote sites, possibly a 3rd, and also 4 or 5 remote users using a VPN client. ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
  • Re: Cisco 857 and 877 routers
    ... The main thing we need from the new routers are the ability to have a ... and also 4 or 5 remote users using a VPN client. ... the 851 can't handle a 10Mbit WAN connection.. ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
  • Re: Shares on vpn-server
    ... The Routers would have to be the VPN Servers not the DCs. ... be rigged as a "Site-to-Site VPN" not as a Remote Access VPN. ... NICs with RRAS setup with a Site-to-Site VPN. ...
    (microsoft.public.isa.vpn)
  • Re: Shares on vpn-server
    ... The Routers would have to be the VPN Servers not the DCs. ... be rigged as a "Site-to-Site VPN" not as a Remote Access VPN. ... NICs with RRAS setup with a Site-to-Site VPN. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)
  • Re: Shares on vpn-server
    ... The Routers would have to be the VPN Servers not the DCs. ... be rigged as a "Site-to-Site VPN" not as a Remote Access VPN. ... NICs with RRAS setup with a Site-to-Site VPN. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)