Re: Replacement for Aironet 350 Workgroup Bridge

In the message <1190918629.117306.170110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Merv wrote:

| On Sep 27, 5:28 am, Merv <merv.hr...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > On Sep 27, 5:00 am, Morph <notimport...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
| >
| > > There are two Cisco Aironet 350 Workgroup Bridge's used to bridge two
| > > locations. One of them is now dead and has to be replaced. What is the
| > > best sollution for replacing the 350 Bridge?
| > > I was thinking about Aironet 1310. Is this the best solution? Can the
| > > customer use the same antenna that he used for the 350?
| > > Thanx in addvance!
| >
| > as far as antenennas are concerened it looks like the unit can be
| > order with either an internal anntenna or with connectors for external
| > antennas.
| >
| > see the data *** @
| >
| > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5861/products_data_sheet09186a0...
|
| well I guess there is the 1310 and the 1410; I am not sure of the
| differences between the two.
|
| Persoanlly I would get a set of which either one you select.
|
| IIRC the 350 is a b radio and the 1310 and 1410 is a g radio.

The website you recomended has this:
"The Cisco Aironet 1300 Series supports the 802.11g standard-providing
54-Mbps data rates with a proven, secure technology while maintaining
full backward compatibility with legacy 802.11b devices" so I guess it
should work with the 350 in 802.11b mode.
.

Quantcast