Re: Cisco ACNS Proxy + TCP_MISS
- From: "Thrill5" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:59:30 -0400
A "?" in a url indicates that the request is a form submission from the
client using a "get". You usually do NOT want to service these requests
from the cache which is why they aren't.
"Damian" <damian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1190092052.829358.103540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi All,
In regards to the ACNS Proxy hardware appliance, I have recently
installed a unit and although it is performing well enough, we are not
seeing anything for savings about 18% for total cache bytes. For total
sites I am seeing above %30 but this does not help. As the byte count
miss is so high.
One entry I am seeing a lot of in relation to a TCP_MISS is a URL with
a "?" within the URL. And any site that contains this is being
classified a a TCP_MISS.
This is causing issues with the total byte counts and not allowing amy
more than 18% for cache hits.
I have a call logged with our supplier, but I do not hold a lot of
hope to get a fix or even a work around for this.
Has anybody else seen this issue or have a work around.
I have been looking into utilising a rule for this, but I do not see
how I can with a ?.
Any suggestions or possible work arounds.
The box is running code 5.5.7.7
Cheers
Damian
.
- References:
- Cisco ACNS Proxy + TCP_MISS
- From: Damian
- Cisco ACNS Proxy + TCP_MISS
- Prev by Date: Re: Trunking 3560 switches over a bridged LAN
- Next by Date: Re: HA VPN?
- Previous by thread: Cisco ACNS Proxy + TCP_MISS
- Next by thread: Best way to secure management dial in
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|