Re: Port forward from one pix over VPN to server in different subnets
- From: Krzysztof Sobieraj <soba@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:40:59 +0200
I am not sure, that it is possible...
--
<------------------
Pozdrawiam:
Krzysztof Sobieraj
KS2804-RIPE
Kazimierz Wielki University
ul. Chodkiewicza 30
85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
ukw.edu.pl
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Brian wrote:
"Krzysztof Sobieraj" <soba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:20070525105126.S34493@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Use a static command:
Usage: [no] static [(real_ifc, mapped_ifc)]
{<mapped_ip>|interface}
{<real_ip> [netmask <mask>]} | {access-list <acl_name>}
[dns] [norandomseq] [<max_conns> [<emb_lim>]]
[no] static [(real_ifc, mapped_ifc)] {tcp|udp}
{<mapped_ip>|interface} <mapped_port>
{<real_ip> <real_port> [netmask <mask>]} |
{access-list <acl_name>}
[dns] [norandomseq] [<max_conns> [<emb_lim>]]
For example:
static (inside,outside) tcp ....
static:
a:) ( Open parenthesis for (<internal_if_name>,<external_if_name>) pair
where <internal_if_name> is the Internal or prenat interface and
<external_if_name> is the External or postnat interface
b:) Hostname or A.B.C.D Global or mapped address
interface Global address overload from interface
tcp TCP to be used as transport protocol
udp UDP to be used as transport protocol
Hostname or A.B.C.D Real IP address of the host or hosts
access-list Configure access-list name after this keyword
c:) configure mode commands/options:
<0-65535> The maximum number of simultaneous tcp connections the
local IP
hosts are to allow, default is 0 which means unlimited
connections. Idle connections are closed after the time
specified
by the timeout conn command
dns Use the created xlate to rewrite DNS address record
netmask Configure Netmask to apply to IP addresses
norandomseq Disable TCP sequence number randomization
tcp Configure TCP specific parameters
udp Configure UDP specific parameters
<cr>
--
<------------------
Pozdrawiam:
Krzysztof Sobieraj
KS2804-RIPE
Kazimierz Wielki University
ul. Chodkiewicza 30
85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
ukw.edu.pl
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Brian wrote:
"Krzysztof Sobieraj" <soba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f35vqn$kbm$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Użytkownik Brian napisał:Hi,If you have 6.3 or leter, use static command and ACL permit functions,
we have 2 Cisco PIX one on each of our 2 sites. IPSEC VPN tunnel between
the 2 working perfectly. I want to forward port 25 and port 443 from the
WAN IP of the PIX in site-A to a LAN IP of a server in site-B.
Have tried all the normal static mappings that work fine where its all
on
the same site but cannot get this setup to work. I'm not even sure if
its
possible. Any help or pointers very much appreciated.
thanks,
Brian.
but this forward propably is not posible...(AS Algorithm) (LANsideA to
-> WAN sideB). You must forward wanIP side A to wan IP side B it wil be
work corectly.
Hi,
how can I forward a WAN side port to another WAN side port though (using
just PIX)? Surely this involves sending back out on same interface it
arrived on?
thanks.
ok, have already tried using static, but from what you say this should work
on site-A PIX:
static (inside,outside) tcp interface smtp mailserver-on-site-B smtp netmask
255.255.255.255 0 0
where the site-A PIX internal LAN IP is 192.168.1.1
and site-B PIX is 192.168.2.1
and mailserver-on-site-B is for example 192.168.2.10
My concern is that this cannot work as the traffic did not orginate on the
LAN side of site-A PIX so its having to come in and go back out on the
site-A PIX external interface.
To be clear, what I want to achieve with the above is that SMTP traffic
arriving on outside of site-A PIX ends up at mailserver-on-site-B.
thanks for your assistance.
- References:
- Port forward from one pix over VPN to server in different subnet
- From: Brian
- Re: Port forward from one pix over VPN to server in different subnet
- From: Krzysztof Sobieraj
- Re: Port forward from one pix over VPN to server in different subnet
- From: Brian
- Re: Port forward from one pix over VPN to server in different subnets
- From: Krzysztof Sobieraj
- Re: Port forward from one pix over VPN to server in different subnets
- From: Brian
- Port forward from one pix over VPN to server in different subnet
- Prev by Date: Re: Port forward from one pix over VPN to server in different subnets
- Next by Date: Re: Port forward from one pix over VPN to server in different subnet
- Previous by thread: Re: Port forward from one pix over VPN to server in different subnets
- Next by thread: Re: Port forward from one pix over VPN to server in different subnet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|