Re: Redundant links between subnets
- From: "Merv" <merv.hrabi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jun 2006 13:55:34 -0700
At least for EIGRP, using the network statment for neighbours has a
nasty side-affect.
From Cisco EIGRP FAQ:
"What does the neighbor statement in the EIGRP configuration section
do?
A. The neighbor command is used in EIGRP to define a neighboring
router with which to exchange routing information. Due to the current
behavior of this command, EIGRP exchanges routing information with the
neighbors in the form of unicast packets whenever the neighbor command
is configured for an interface. EIGRP will stop processing all
multicast packets coming inbound on that interface. Also, EIGRP stops
sending multicast packets on that interface.
The ideal behavior of this command would be for EIGRP to start
sending EIGRP packets as unicast packets to the specified neighbor, but
not stop sending and receiving multicast packets on that interface.
Since the command does not behave as intended, the neighbor command
should be used carefully, understanding the impact of the command on
the network."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Redundant links between subnets
- From: Ghazan Haider
- Re: Redundant links between subnets
- References:
- Redundant links between subnets
- From: Ghazan Haider
- Re: Redundant links between subnets
- From: stephen
- Re: Redundant links between subnets
- From: Ghazan Haider
- Re: Redundant links between subnets
- From: anybody43
- Re: Redundant links between subnets
- From: Merv
- Re: Redundant links between subnets
- From: Ghazan Haider
- Re: Redundant links between subnets
- From: Merv
- Re: Redundant links between subnets
- From: Ghazan Haider
- Redundant links between subnets
- Prev by Date: Re: Redundant links between subnets
- Next by Date: ROMMON Upgrade on sup2 6506
- Previous by thread: Re: Redundant links between subnets
- Next by thread: Re: Redundant links between subnets
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|