Re: Cisco PIX 501: Can't ping global IP-Adress from NATed IP
- From: "Michael Schuberl" <cisco_pix@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 08:07:59 +0200
Am 04.05.2006, 23:53 Uhr, schrieb Walter Roberson <roberson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
In article <op.s81jmove7mx1hz@localhost>,
Michael Schuberl <cisco_pix@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
If that was your requirement, then you chose the wrong product.I finally got that in writing ;)
The PIX 501 cannot do that by itself, and possibly will never be able
to do that...
and I and others have mentioned that many timesSorry, I am rather new to this newsgroup. And it seems I didn't prepare well.
in this newsgroup.
Any other model of PIX or ASA that is currently on sale would be able
to handle the situation [presuming 6.3(2) or later software]
(though the 506e would require the assistance of a vlan-aware switch.)
You must either add hardware, change hardware, or give up theOk, what hardware should be added in order to be able to acomplish the scenario?
requirement that internal hosts must be able to access the servers
by the external IP address instead of by the host name.
You indicated that adding DNS to the mix was not an option. ThatWell there already is a DNS on that network, will that be sufficient?
significantly constrains your software-based solutions.
It would help if you were to explain -why- DNS is not an option,
and why internal clients must be able to access the servers via
the public IP *address* rather than the hostname.
Will the PIX be able to translate the lookup-requests then and substitute the external for the internal adress? (that "alias"-thing, right?)
To my mind, the DNS resolves the request to the external IP. Therefore, the client will again try to communicate with that address and the PIX would still not able to translate that IP to the internal IP.
In my understanding, another DNS server at the PIX's inside could solve that issue. Am I right?
The reason why I didn't want to set up an DNS is my lack of experience with such services and it seems that some costume software we use simply isn't using the gethostbyname() function and is therefor doomed to use IPs.
Also the whole setup already did work without a firewall and fewer nodes (it comes down to just plugging in the nodes, setting the default gateway).
My task is to put that PIX infront of the nodes. The first thing I learned back then was: it is not possible to force the PIX to behave in a transparent way (e.g. just filter and foreward the traffic for x.x.x.0-x.x.x.15 - without NAT), or did I configure something wrong?
Thanks for your patience Walter Roberson!
--
Erstellt mit Operas revolutionärem E-Mail-Modul: http://www.opera.com/mail/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cisco PIX 501: Can't ping global IP-Adress from NATed IP
- From: Walter Roberson
- Re: Cisco PIX 501: Can't ping global IP-Adress from NATed IP
- References:
- Cisco PIX 501: Can't ping global IP-Adress from NATed IP
- From: Michael Schuberl
- Re: Cisco PIX 501: Can't ping global IP-Adress from NATed IP
- From: Walter Roberson
- Re: Cisco PIX 501: Can't ping global IP-Adress from NATed IP
- From: Michael Schuberl
- Re: Cisco PIX 501: Can't ping global IP-Adress from NATed IP
- From: Walter Roberson
- Cisco PIX 501: Can't ping global IP-Adress from NATed IP
- Prev by Date: Migrating from IGRP to EIGRP
- Next by Date: Part Numbers for 8 / 16 Port GE 6500 Blade with Mesh Backplane
- Previous by thread: Re: Cisco PIX 501: Can't ping global IP-Adress from NATed IP
- Next by thread: Re: Cisco PIX 501: Can't ping global IP-Adress from NATed IP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|