Re: PIX 501 VPN RAS
- From: "POP3.demon.co.uk" <tgay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:01:49 -0000
Hi Lutz
This is getting complicated! I had hoped it would be a little easier... I am
thinking that I may start again from the beginning.
If you get a moment could you give me the benefit of your knowledge and
recommend how I should set up a simple VPN.
We have a Win2003 server (if relevant), obviously we have the PIX501 and
Netgear ADSL router.My only requirements are that I must be able to use
Terminal Server and be able to access any drive on any server on our
network.....
Even if it meant buying additional equipment, how would you set up a VPN?
Please.....
Tony
"Lutz Donnerhacke" <lutz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrndq04gk.101.lutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>* POP3.demon.co.uk wrote:
>> I am still a little confused over having to need two fixed public
>> addresses
>>
>> We currently have one fixed IP from the ISP which connects to a Netgear
>> router which acts as a DHCP server and gives out an IP address to the
>> PIX.
>
> So the Pix itself is behind NAT.
> => Forget about PPTP (Windows VPN)
> Forget about L2TP over native IPSec (Windows VPN)
>
> You will need at least a patch for Windows (NAT traversal). Futhermore
> connecting to a NATted server is not supported in Windows.
>
>> I have a diagram off the Cisco site which seems to indicate only one is
>> needed. I do not mean to offend but can you explain why the following
>> will
>> not work (or rather where I am getting confused)
>
> PPTP is not supported by PIX itself. If you want to use a Windows Server
> as
> RAS device, you will need to forward GRE protocol, which does not contain
> any session information. In order to forward this protocol, the PIX must
> know which session refers to a single packet. Because the payload of the
> GRE
> packet is encrypted the only usable value is the IP address. Therefore you
> need a distinct public IP address for such PPTP connections. PIX 7.0
> contains an educated guess algoithm which might remoce this restriction.
>
> L2TP over IPSec is supported by PIX itself. Therefore you can use a single
> address. Unfortunly IPSec is not specified for NAT enviroments, so you
> have
> to use a public address on the PIX. PIX 7.0 does not support L2TP over
> IPSec.
>
> If possible, drop the Netgear router from your setup.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PIX 501 VPN RAS
- From: Lutz Donnerhacke
- Re: PIX 501 VPN RAS
- References:
- PIX 501 VPN RAS
- From: POP3.demon.co.uk
- Re: PIX 501 VPN RAS
- From: Lutz Donnerhacke
- Re: PIX 501 VPN RAS
- From: POP3.demon.co.uk
- Re: PIX 501 VPN RAS
- From: Lutz Donnerhacke
- PIX 501 VPN RAS
- Prev by Date: 2611 Question
- Next by Date: Re: PIX 501 VPN RAS
- Previous by thread: Re: PIX 501 VPN RAS
- Next by thread: Re: PIX 501 VPN RAS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|