Re: CISCO 2600 - routing problem

Kris_M wrote: 
Situation like this on CISCO 2600:

fa0/0 - 61.XXX.XXX.243 255.255.255.248 - connected to T1 61.XXX.XXX.241 255.255.255.248

fa0/1 - 72.XXX.XXX.11 255.255.255.248 - connected to cable modem 72.XXX.XXX.9 255.255.255.248

E1/0 - 61.XXX.XXX.253 255.255.255.248- connected to host 61.XXX.XXX.249 255.255.255.248

I have Internet access from both the router and the host with static route over T1: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 61.XXX.XXX.241

but with static route over cable modem :
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 72.XXX.XXX.9
I can ping Internet (for example yahoo.com) only from router not from the host.
From the host I can just ping the cable modem 72.XXX.XXX.9. I can't ping the next hop after the modem what is 72.XXX.XXX.14/29

What is the problem? Please help.

Current configuration : 1027 bytes
!
version 12.3
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
!
hostname FDI
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
enable secret 5 $1$RiU/$7c8alL.w7IB7PcDbxcA/3.
enable password 7 15211C5D520A7870
!
no network-clock-participate slot 1
no network-clock-participate wic 0
no aaa new-model
ip subnet-zero
no ip source-route
ip cef
!
ip name-server 64.118.139.51
ip name-server 64.118.139.52
no ftp-server write-enable
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
 ip address 61.XXX.XXX.243 255.255.255.248
 no ip redirects
 no ip unreachables
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
 ip address 72.XXX.XXX.11 255.255.255.248
 no ip redirects
 no ip unreachables
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
interface Ethernet1/0
 ip address 61.XXX.XXX.253 255.255.255.248
 half-duplex
!
ip classless
no ip route static inter-vrf
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 72.XXX.XXX.9
no ip http server
!
no cdp run
!
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
 password 7 03127D0F5359671B1F
 login
!
end

If you can ping the cable modem's interface from both the Cisco 2600 & from your host, and therefore the interface (fa0/1) connected to the cable modem is showing up/up status, then the problem isn't with your Cisco router, it's with the cable modem/line.

I suspect that when you connect to the router and ping the next hop after the cable modem, that the packets are actually going out over the T1 connection. Or did you shut down/disconnect that interface before trying that? Try to do a traceroute 72.XXX.XXX.14 to see if that's the case.

John

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ng_one2many v.s. AFT (NIC Fault Tolerance/Fail Over/Redundancy Revisited)
    ... > hosts weren't seeing the usual warnings about MAC address changes. ... regardless of what network segment/port a host ... > physical interface ifconfig'd with the IP. ... > tree root and switch 1 is the backup spanning tree root. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: cant ping or telnet to or from a cat 3550
    ... Logging is enabled but shows nothing at all other than a couple ... Interface FastEthernet0/18, changed state to down ... I am trying to ping from a host on Vlan 9, ... from the switch which also does not work. ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
  • Re: Point-to-Point links - route IP Block with DSL
    ... Subnet mask: 255.255.255.248 ... I can see from above that if the route table fails to find ... Yes, it is a host route, with no subnet. ... the PPP interface gets all traffic from your ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Proxy ARP and Routing
    ... some CPE from our ISP connected to a firewall. ... the public IPs on the physical DMZ network. ... packets to the host on the DMZ? ... on the DMZ interface. ...
    (SunManagers)
  • Re: Zeroconfig and Multicast DNS
    ... Apple's primary consumer base for Zeroconf systems doesn't normally have to deal with multi-homed systems; so it probably isn't much of a priority for them. ... I suspect that the decision was made fairly early to only support it on one interface at a time. ... That section covers the merging of two previously disjoint networks, ... for the case of connecting a multihomed host which is bridging them, ...
    (freebsd-net)