Re: Routing protocol for MPLS
- From: "www.networking-forum.com" <steve@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:29:22 GMT
With my limited understanding, here are my answers:
1) No, it replaces ATM and FR.
2) Any interior routing protocol can be used. IS-IS, EIGRP, OSPF, RIP, etc.
3) I'd say it's layer 2.
4) Yes. I think you are referring to the popular product MPLS VPN. In
which case, MPLS traffic can be designated as belonging to a specific
customer.
Regards,
Steve
www.networking-forum.com
<bluetooth995@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1130051580.176201.44780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi
>
> A bit confuse with MPLS, Please help on this:
>
> 1) is ATM or FR use in MPLS?
> 2) what' s the routing protocol used? I know it used label switching by
> adding label on the header to aids in the routing of packets.
> 3) which layer does MPLS falls in OSI model , L2 or L3 ?
> 4) is MPLS considered a true leased line (Private line)?
>
> Thanks
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Routing protocol for MPLS
- From: nospam
- Re: Routing protocol for MPLS
- References:
- Routing protocol for MPLS
- From: bluetooth995@xxxxxxxxx
- Routing protocol for MPLS
- Prev by Date: IS IPSEC FEATURE REQUIRED IN THE CUSTOMER EDGE ROUTER ?
- Next by Date: Re: IS IPSEC FEATURE REQUIRED IN THE CUSTOMER EDGE ROUTER ?
- Previous by thread: Routing protocol for MPLS
- Next by thread: Re: Routing protocol for MPLS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|