Re: FWSM - STP
- From: Wim Holemans <wim.holemans@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:25:00 +0200
Thanks for the reply but I didn't formulate my question in the right way, i think : i know you can disable STP's (and i know how), but what i really wanted to know was, is STP is needed on these interconnecting vlans or not ? If there
is a specific reason why STP should stay on on this vlans ? I know the
connection between router en FWSM is a 6 Gig etherchannel, but i can't find note in the doc if STP should be on/off on this vlan.
Wim Holemans
Morten Skriver wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:27:08 +0200, Wim Holemans wrote:
Does anyone knows if i can disable STP on the vlan connecting router and FWSM module in a 65xx ? It seems that spanning-tree is enable by default on this vlan and we are trying to minimize the number of STP instances on our router.
You can do it with;
s1(config)#no spanning-tree vlan ? WORD vlan range, example: 1,3-5,7,9-11
/Morten
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FWSM - STP
- From: Morten Skriver
- Re: FWSM - STP
- References:
- FWSM - STP
- From: Wim Holemans
- Re: FWSM - STP
- From: Morten Skriver
- FWSM - STP
- Prev by Date: Cat 6006 atm conf problem
- Next by Date: Re: Again: Pix VPN & Routing
- Previous by thread: Re: FWSM - STP
- Next by thread: Re: FWSM - STP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|