Re: PIX 6.3 - capture command
- From: Francois Labreque <flabreque@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 15:11:25 -0400
Walter Roberson wrote:
In article <ddnicb$74v$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Amaury Ronflard <amaury99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: :I have two PIX
and, an access-list to bound to what to encrypt to get to pix-b
access-list to-pix-b permit tcp 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.128 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.128 eq 5222 access-list to-pix-b permit tcp 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.128 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.128 access-list to-pix-b permit icmp 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.128 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.128 eq 5222 access-list to-pix-b permit icmp 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.128 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.128
The third and fourth lines duplicate the first and second.
Actually, the third line doesn't make sense... "eq" is not a valid keyword with ICMP, and there's no such thing as an ICMP type 5222 packet.
-- Francois Labreque | The surest sign of the existence of extra- flabreque | terrestrial intelligence is that they never @ | bothered to come down here and visit us! videotron.ca | - Calvin .
- References:
- PIX 6.3 - capture command
- From: Amaury Ronflard
- Re: PIX 6.3 - capture command
- From: Walter Roberson
- PIX 6.3 - capture command
- Prev by Date: Re: Ciscoworks VMS on Windows Cluster
- Next by Date: Re: Conflicting uses of "ip dhcp-server" -- design flaw?
- Previous by thread: Re: PIX 6.3 - capture command
- Next by thread: Cpu utilisation is high in cat 3550 EMI switch
- Index(es):