Re: route field

Albert Manfredi wrote:
On Jun 29, 4:16 am, vicky <vikrant.pan...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hi,
is there is a necessity of route field in layer 2 switch ...

Can you be more specific in describing what you are asking?

Maybe he is asking about CFI + E-RIF support which is not necessary
to support. If I remember correctly the standard suggests that packets
with CFI should not be supported in modern equipment.

--Kim
.

Relevant Pages

  • route field
    ... is there is a necessity of route field in layer 2 switch ... ...
    (comp.dcom.lans.ethernet)
  • Re: 2.6.23-rc8-mm2
    ... duplicate filename 'switch' can not be created ... 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team ... # IPVS transport protocol load balancing support ... # Device Drivers ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Pomposity, thy name is Berlinski
    ... scam outfit. ... since the ID perps started running the bait and switch on their own ... but only after the ID perps lost in Dover. ... creationist support base, and that would have been the time to get ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Pomposity, thy name is Berlinski
    ... scam outfit. ... How many Discovery Institute fellows have disavowed intelligent design ... since the ID perps started running the bait and switch on their own ... creationist support base, and that would have been the time to get ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Pomposity, thy name is Berlinski
    ... scam outfit. ... since the ID perps started running the bait and switch on their own ... creationist support base, and that would have been the time to get ... Well, of course there's Behe. ...
    (talk.origins)