Re: Mac address and VLAns
- From: vicky <vikrant.pandey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 27, 11:52 am, rober...@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Walter Roberson) wrote:
In article <a3103bea-bfcf-4070-b916-e25ac6b4a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
vicky <vikrant.pan...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've a query with me regarding with Single STP with multiple port
based vlans
then
What u say about a single instance of STP is used for all port based
vlans
for exp-
If using a switch controller with only IEEE 802.1D support and using
port based vlans
then plz tell me is at this scenerio any mechanism is implemented for
making inter - vlan data transmission accessible.
I believe the answer is NO, in that case there is no such mechanism.
(I looked at your diagram.)
Single instance STP does not know anything about VLANs and will
not take VLANs into account in creating the spanning tree.
If that happens to cut a link needed for a particular VLAN to make
it through the switches between two points, then Tough Tootsies.
Do not use single-instance STP with VLANs.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
please check the following link
http://vikrantpandey.diinoweb.com/files/
here a file named as stp.txt
and tell me plz what u say about this situation
is a switch controller support for inter vlan data transmission is
necessary for that situation.
Thanks
Vikrant
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mac address and VLAns
- From: Rich Seifert
- Re: Mac address and VLAns
- References:
- Mac address and VLAns
- From: vicky
- Re: Mac address and VLAns
- From: vicky
- Re: Mac address and VLAns
- From: Rich Seifert
- Re: Mac address and VLAns
- From: vicky
- Re: Mac address and VLAns
- From: Walter Roberson
- Mac address and VLAns
- Prev by Date: Re: Mac address and VLAns
- Next by Date: Re: Mac address and VLAns
- Previous by thread: Re: Mac address and VLAns
- Next by thread: Re: Mac address and VLAns
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|