Re: Mapping class D to Ethernet physical address
- From: Albert Manfredi <bert22306@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 11, 2:24 pm, vicky <vikrant.pan...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ok , Is the multicating related enteries which made in layer 2 switch
are always be static or it may be aging bit set , or... the behaviour
of enteries for multicast table in layer 2 switch is depand on the
behaviour or say which type of register support by a switch
controller (either it static or dynamic)
Are you talking about IGMP snooping here? If yes, the forwarding of
multicasts to a port times out, as stated in RFC 4541, bottom of page
5. It is also dynamic, though, listening for IGMP leave messages.
Have you read through this yet?
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4541.txt?number=4541
Bert
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mapping class D to Ethernet physical address
- From: vicky
- Re: Mapping class D to Ethernet physical address
- References:
- Mapping class D to Ethernet physical address
- From: vicky
- Re: Mapping class D to Ethernet physical address
- From: Albert Manfredi
- Re: Mapping class D to Ethernet physical address
- From: vicky
- Mapping class D to Ethernet physical address
- Prev by Date: Re: IP layer and layer 2 IGMP Snooping
- Next by Date: Re: IP layer and layer 2 IGMP Snooping
- Previous by thread: Re: Mapping class D to Ethernet physical address
- Next by thread: Re: Mapping class D to Ethernet physical address
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
