Re: Spanning Tree Protocol
- From: vicky <vikrant.pandey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 02:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 7, 1:12 am, Albert Manfredi <bert22...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 6, 1:32 am, vicky <vikrant.pan...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Now my question is , weather the ports for 3 hosts (pc1, pc2 and pc3)
of switch 2 are also became designated port.
And why????
Is there something in Rich Seifert's response, or in mine, that didn't
answer your question?
In other words, are these three ports of the switch, to which the
three hosts connect, not edge ports? If they are edge ports, then is
there something in the replies you received that isn't clear?
To draw ASCII pictures, you have to use a font in which each character
is assigned the same amount of space on the line. Try Courier font,
for example, and be sure to use a return at the end of each line.
Bert
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello,
As some switches support MSTP, Some others support RSTP ,, so is that
switches are also compatible with those switches , which support only
STP (IEEE 802.1d).
If it is possible then please also tell me ...
Is any bits to be set for providing the compatiblity with those
switches which support MSTP or RSTP , with switch which support only
simple STP.
or it done automatically by switch hardware.
Thanks in advance.
Vikrant
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Spanning Tree Protocol
- From: Albert Manfredi
- Re: Spanning Tree Protocol
- References:
- Spanning Tree Protocol
- From: vicky
- Re: Spanning Tree Protocol
- From: vicky
- Re: Spanning Tree Protocol
- From: Rich Seifert
- Re: Spanning Tree Protocol
- From: vicky
- Re: Spanning Tree Protocol
- From: Albert Manfredi
- Spanning Tree Protocol
- Prev by Date: IP layer and layer 2 IGMP Snooping
- Next by Date: Re: Spanning Tree Protocol
- Previous by thread: Re: Spanning Tree Protocol
- Next by thread: Re: Spanning Tree Protocol
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|