Re: Use of ethernet frame without TCP/IP
- From: indermeet.gandhi@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
You could setup a private IP network, using addresses from the private
blocks detailed in [RFC1918].
I need to encapsulte the data in the ethernet frame without using TCP/
IP . Only just the length parameter in the EtherType/Length field of
ethernet frame . Is this possible ?
If yes , how can it be done ?
Well, yes, altough the details depend on the software you're using.
Under linux opening a raw ethernet socket (which probably requires
root rights) is a possibility.
Question is, what made you conclude you need to bypass the IP stack and
dispense with its services?
As noted above, there is a way to use IP addresses while not connected
to the internet. I think doing that will likely be simpler and easier.
Well , if I want to talk between 2 ethernet devices directly ( both in
same LAN) , won't the bypassing of IP stack provide me with better
latency , avoiding overhead of IP header ( or maybe TCP header ) .
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Use of ethernet frame without TCP/IP
- From: stephen
- Re: Use of ethernet frame without TCP/IP
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Use of ethernet frame without TCP/IP
- From: Patrick Schaaf
- Re: Use of ethernet frame without TCP/IP
- References:
- Use of ethernet frame without TCP/IP
- From: indermeet . gandhi
- Re: Use of ethernet frame without TCP/IP
- From: jpd
- Use of ethernet frame without TCP/IP
- Prev by Date: Re: Use of ethernet frame without TCP/IP
- Next by Date: Re: Use of ethernet frame without TCP/IP
- Previous by thread: Re: Use of ethernet frame without TCP/IP
- Next by thread: Re: Use of ethernet frame without TCP/IP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|