Re: What LAN speeds can I expect?



On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 23:15:40 -0600, Stephanie wrote
(in article <0001HW.C3F36C7C007B5E50B01AD9AF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):

We just upgraded the office network, pulling new cat-5e cable over the
suspended ceiling and into the walls. All connections use quality hardware.
The gigabit switch is a LinkSys SR2024:

<http://tinyurl.com/39s8xr>

The computers are 1-year-old Dell desktops running a mix of Win XP and 2K.
These have Intel brand gigabit NICs installed.

There is nothing between computers on the LAN except the SR2024.

When copying a test file between computers, we're seeing 10-12
megabytes/second. This isn't anywhere near what I was expecting.

It also depends upon the hard drive(s) involved on each end, there are
not a lot of desktop hard disk setups capable of saturating a gig-E
connection one way, much less in both directions.

If the local hard drive can't be read from or written to at 125MB/s,
then you can't expect it to pump data over the network that quickly
either. Most desktop drives fall far short of that. Next stack on
variables like file system cluster size, overhead of virus scanning
software, firewalls, etc.

File copying might have been useful for testing network throughput back
when networks were slower than local storage I/O, but it's not with
GigE in general. You would typically need a pretty good RAID setup
with a fair number of spindles to get there.

I realize
that 1 gigabit speeds are only theoretical and reserved for only those
optimized systems with the fastest busses and hard drives, but I think my
numbers are a tad low.

Your numbers didn't measure the network, but rather the slowest link in
the chain, which was likely the write capability of the drive receiving
the copy of the file.

What speeds can we expect? What is slowing down this new network?

There may be nothing slowing down the network. Do a network throughput
test using a piece of software designed for doing that, that
sends/receives data (usually memory<->memory with no disk involved
directly) instead. Ideally, you should be able to get 125MB/s in
either direction, and quite close to double that when testing
bidirectionally.


--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw





.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dual connection - network & local
    ... >I have a need to have the two computers talk to BOTH the lan AND each other. ... >The reason for this is the video software I use allows for network rendering ... >using the gigabit lan. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: Dual connection - network & local
    ... >>>The reason for this is the video software I use allows for network rendering ... >>>The advantage of the gigabit is obviously speed at 1000mb for rendering. ... I connect my two main computers to a Fast ... Since FireWire is faster, I transfer files between ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: home network multihoming (newbie)
    ... I want to use one of my computers as a file server ... I want to connect B and A over gigabit (probably ... >a file server, it is really fast. ... an IP in a different subnet (you used x's in your network addresses so ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: problem sharing documents
    ... All the computers are running Windows XP and all have Office ... > and newsletters in Publisher. ... If you are saving over a network, ... then transfer the file to the hard drives of the other ...
    (microsoft.public.publisher)
  • RE: Please Help me Solve my Networking Problem!
    ... I'm getting kind of desperate here, as my mother's computers' memory keeps ... > click on Local Area Network and Properties. ... > protocol and clik properties button. ... >> That person's next suggestion was to connect the hard drives with a "ribbon ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)

Loading