Re: VLANS and subnetting
- From: tech.support.b@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 05:44:20 -0000
On Oct 1, 2:45 am, Albert Manfredi <bert22...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 30, 5:44 pm, tech.suppor...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi all. I am new to VLAN's. I have a requirement, and I want to know
whether it is technically possible to do.
I have a link coming over Cat6, from ISP to my switch. Network
10.1.23.0 / 24
I have few switches in my premises. cisco 3560, 2960.
For certain of my applications, I need to create seperate VLAN's.as i
understood, every VLAN has to be a seperate subnet. Could I subnet the
existing network of
10.1.23.0 into multiple subnets. / 28 or / 30 according to my needs
internally, and create seperate VLAN for each subnet, and they will
still talk to the ISP core switch as it were a / 24 network. I could
do this and get it to work if it was purely for LAN purposes, however,
the Core switch of ISP links me to my WAN (remote networks 10.1.1.0 ~
10.1.22.0, 22 locations ) ..
each IP in this network needs to talk to every other network, and the
vice versa. I know that if i do not subnet the network, it works fine
as a single VLAN.
Is there any way that I could have multiple VLAN's and still have
connectivity to and from my other networks, using same subnet or a
subnetted subnets ??
VLANs should be thought of, from an IP perspective, as if they are
separate Ethernets. Which means, if you have multiple VLANs and each
one is a different IP subnet, you will need an IP router (layer 3
switch) to tie them together. Just the same as you'd do with multiple
different physical Ethernet LANs (or catenets, to be precise).
So the first question is, is the box that ties you to the ISP a VLAN-
aware router? Or is it just a layer 2 switch? If it's just a layer 2
switch, you will need to add a VLAN-aware router in your premises.
This would be a router which undertands that the internal Ethernet
connection is meant to represent multiple VLANs, and the router will
then route IP packets to the correct VLAN according to its routing
table.
But there's more, in this case. It sounds like you are trying to
connect each end system, i.e. each host, directly to the same
Ethernet? The one that incorporates multiple VLANs? Is that correct?
If so, then each host of your internal network will need to be "VLAN
aware," meaning that these hosts need to understand the Ethernet
header extension described in IEEE 802.1Q. Same goes for the router
connected to this internal Ethernet. While layer 2 switches will often
do this, I don't know how prevalent that is among end systems.
I'd consider instaling the various IP subnets you need on separate
Ethernets, rather than using VLANs. Use a different layer 2 switch for
every IP subnet in this inside network.
Bert- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I am limited with certain constraints here. Because of the physical
dimensions of the building, we are concentrating the cables into 4
different points. so lets say around 6 switches. each switch serves
different applications. Like, VOIP, IPTV and data only applications. ,
thats why i want to create Seperate VLANS, so that I could isolate the
traffic each app needs.
second thing. our ISP, in each site, configures for us a class C
network. So if I were to use multiple VLANS, that means multiple
subnets. So only one VLAN, that comes from the ISP would be able to
communicate to outside world. May be I could make the other VLAN's
communicate to outside world using the gateway of the ISP's VLAN,
however, i need other Remote networks also talk to my PC's inside,
which fall in to multiple subnets. Technically, the only subnet that
my other networks willl be aware of is the VLAN subnet provided by the
ISP..
I hope you understood the problem here.
Thanks for the quick response
Techs
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VLANS and subnetting
- From: stephen
- Re: VLANS and subnetting
- From: Albert Manfredi
- Re: VLANS and subnetting
- From: Albert Manfredi
- Re: VLANS and subnetting
- From: Robert Redelmeier
- Re: VLANS and subnetting
- References:
- VLANS and subnetting
- From: tech . support . b
- Re: VLANS and subnetting
- From: Albert Manfredi
- VLANS and subnetting
- Prev by Date: Re: VLANS and subnetting
- Next by Date: Re: VLANS and subnetting
- Previous by thread: Re: VLANS and subnetting
- Next by thread: Re: VLANS and subnetting
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|