Re: Several questions about LLC...
- From: "Albert Manfredi" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:19:10 GMT
"Rich Seifert" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No. Type 3 service is a cobbled-together kludge attempting to achieve
contradictory goals. On the one hand, it purports to be a
"connectionless service", i.e., simple frame exchange without guarantees
of performance. On the other hand, it purports to be an "acknowledged
service", i.e., complexity is added to provide an indication that the
"connectionless frames" were actually delivered.
At the time, I thought the IEEE was trying to design into LLC all of the functionalities of previous standards, including RS-232 and X.25. In this example, wasn't X.25 acknowledged at layer 2? (And, for some frame types, 802.11 also sends ACKs at layer 2.)
Bert
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Several questions about LLC...
- From: Rich Seifert
- Re: Several questions about LLC...
- References:
- Several questions about LLC...
- From: lander
- Re: Several questions about LLC...
- From: Rich Seifert
- Re: Several questions about LLC...
- From: lander
- Re: Several questions about LLC...
- From: Rich Seifert
- Several questions about LLC...
- Prev by Date: Re: Several questions about LLC...
- Next by Date: Re: Several questions about LLC...
- Previous by thread: Re: Several questions about LLC...
- Next by thread: Re: Several questions about LLC...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|