Re: Long ethernet
- From: William P.N. Smith <news2006c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 07:52:25 -0400
"grisley" <amarqueta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But if two
loggers are trying to communicate at the same time in the same
direction,
_ There must be some sort of buffer in each switch in case both signals
arrive at the same time, right?
Yes, the switches do something along the lines of store and forward.
_ Even though the traffic won't be high at all, what would happen in
case of buffer overrun? Would a colission signal find its way back to
the sender datalogger?
Again, if your traffic is low, you won't have buffer overrun. If
packets are dropped for whatever reason, the sending datalogger won't
receive it's TCP/IP ack, and will resend.
_ The datalogger must support full duplex or the switch could reproduce
a colission signal if needed?
It's not a collision signal, it's a lack-of-ack that causes the retry.
.
- References:
- Long ethernet
- From: grisley
- Re: Long ethernet
- From: grisley
- Long ethernet
- Prev by Date: Re: Long ethernet
- Next by Date: CAT5 and Level 5?
- Previous by thread: Re: Long ethernet
- Next by thread: CAT5 and Level 5?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|