Re: Large network question
- From: snertking <snertking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:42:27 -0500
whytwelve13@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I have a question regarding one network I am supposed to build and
administer. It should be put in a building that has 23 floors, of which
around 10-15 will be connected. Every floor will have 20-50 computers
connected, which are separated by walls. Each of the wall-separated
groups include 4, 8 or 10 computers and there are at most 5 groups per
floor. There is a possibility of devices like printers to be connected,
but that is not important right now. The computers will be primarily
used for file-sharing, possibly some gaming (Counter-Strike-alike
games). Some servers might exist on the network (HTTP, FTP, mail
server), but that is not a requirement.
Everything is relative. To many here, this is not a large network.
I have built small networks with around 10-20 computers, but never a
network of this size. I am sure that there are some problems that I am
not aware of, so I would like to explore this in depth. Does anybody
have links to some tutorials on the Net about how to make such network?
It should address possible problems that do not happen (or are not a
problem) in small networks.
Here is a solution that I am thinking of. I would put enough 8-port
(for small computer groups) or 12-port switches (for bigger computer
groups) on the floor, depending on how that floor is about to be
connected (not every computer should be). I would put two or three
switches on some floors which have 16 or 24 ports, so every of 10-15
floors would be connected to them directly. A scheme would be:
Legend:
[] - Group of 4, 8 or 10 computers
n* - n-port Switch (e.g. 12* - 12 port switch)
MFS - To some of the main-floor 16- or 24-port switches
Example floor (with 26 computers):
[4] [8] [10] [4]
| | | |
8* 12* 12* 8*
| | | |
MFS---/ | |
| | | |
| \---------/ |
\-----------------/
All other floors would be connected in the same way, so MFSs would have
say 40-60 places occupied in total. Some of MFSs would be used as a
central gathering point:
MFS1---\
|
MFS2---+--- *(possibly)* ---Router----Internet
|
MFS3---/
It would be possible to connect this network to a broadband Internet
link, using a router connected to MFS2, as pointed. What do you think
about this? Any problems with this? I am concerned about the
possibility of a broadcast storm. Is this a problem? How could be this
avoided e.g. by using routers? As I found out, using routers would
prevent users from using file-sharing (at least using Windows
machines). Is this true and what is the solution?
Help is VERY appreciated.
Better way to do it, assuming this network is going to be in place for a few years, reliability is important, and you have a decent budget:
Get decen MANAGED switches on each floor, so that you have the ability to do Spanning Tree (don't want any loops bringing the net down!) and run fiber uplinks back to a small core switch. You might HAVE to run fiber anyway, you can't do cat5 over 100m (or about 300 ft) with ethernet.
Get a decent core switch with layer 3 functionality. That way you can segment off the floors onto their own subnets if you so desire, and do your routing at the core. A decent small core switch will more than handle the load. No need for the
File sharing certainly CAN be done on windows between networks, assuming you run a local DNS server that has all the PC's names in it, or run a WINS server. If you are not familiar with these concepts, you are in over your head. Hire a pro.
.
- References:
- Large network question
- From: whytwelve13
- Large network question
- Prev by Date: Re: Help! need router rcommendation
- Next by Date: Re: Large network question
- Previous by thread: Re: Large network question
- Next by thread: Re: Large network question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
