Re: Low-end Layer 3 switch?

Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> wrote:
glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> wrote:

Just what is the difference between a "switch" doing things at the
network layer and a "router" doing things at the network layer?
(snip)

I would say a layer 3 switch should have more special purpose
hardware, such as would be expected in a layer 2 switch.

A router is usually mostly software, with more or less conventional
NICs and a COTS processor.

So, implementation detail is more important than function?

As with the old saying, form follows function. If you can do
it with cheap hardware there is no point in using expensive custom
hardware. As processors get faster, the dividing line will move.

My understanding is that those big honking "core routers" from the
likes of Cisco, Juniper, Foundry et al are very much special purpose
hardware.

Probably. The last time I opened a Cisco router (a lower end
model, about 10 years ago.) I was surprised to see ordinary hardware.

I understand that one can run Linux on a Linksys WRT54G, for
example.

It seems that one can run some variant of Linux on just about anything
with a clock pulse :)

How about the core router mentioned above?

Similar to the way a layer 2 switch might have a processor to
handle tasks other than packet forwarding, a layer 3 switch might
have a similar processing function. Packet forwarding should be
done without the involvement of the processor, or with minimal
involvement, other than to update routing tables.

By that definition then the really high-end (and probably not quite so
really high end) routers from the vendors would be switches.


Maybe. Though the people that buy them probably don't care
what they are called as long as they work up to their
specifications.

-- glen
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Data corruption when transfering across network?
    ... > motherboard's hardware is corrupting IDE traffic, ... check that the LAN cables aren't running next to noisy mains ... only 3ft from the router. ... switch or router? ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Low-end Layer 3 switch?
    ... network layer and a "router" doing things at the network layer? ... hardware, such as would be expected in a layer 2 switch. ... My understanding is that those big honking "core routers" from the ...
    (comp.dcom.lans.ethernet)
  • Re: How do network switches work?
    ... route. ... A router is not a switch. ... I understand the combination of hardware and software typically ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Low-end Layer 3 switch?
    ... Just what is the difference between a "switch" doing things at the ... network layer and a "router" doing things at the network layer? ... The glass is neither half-empty nor half-full. ...
    (comp.dcom.lans.ethernet)
  • Re: Low-end Layer 3 switch?
    ... network layer and a "router" doing things at the network layer? ... I would say a layer 3 switch should have more special purpose ... A router is usually mostly software, ...
    (comp.dcom.lans.ethernet)