Re: "code" tables?
- From: "Frank Swarbrick" <Frank.Swarbrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:23:33 -0600
<69KdnXkzOICq8sbVnZ2dnUVZ8tDinZ2d@xxxxxxxxx>, RoyOn 6/20/2008 at 2:49 AM, in message
Hann<specially@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Frank Swarbrick" <Frank.Swarbrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:485950E4.6F0F.0085.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The following is a message from a fellow programmer to a group of usethat
are involved in table design:
"We are planning on creating 'account opening sources' lookup table to
store
'account source' codes and corresponding descriptions. Problem with
storing
this data in a dedicated table is that as we go on we'd end up with tens
and
possibly hundreds of lookup tables.
So what? Tables aren't rationed.
The desire to conceal complexity is not the same as the desire to remove
complexity. The former is counterproductive while the latter is
praiseworthy. What you describe is a a desire to conceal what is going
on.
How does that help anyone?
Honestly, I don't know his reasoning. We're going to have a discussion next
week about it, and I'm sure more than one of us will shoot it down. Until
then I'm not sure what is real concern is.
Maybe the implicit concern is not the number of tables in the database
but
the amount of code required to maintain them. That's a programming
problem.
Hmm, I don't think that's it. Why would it be any more work? If anything
it's more work for the DBA, because he has to define the new table!
Get the programmors off their asses and tell them to learn how to write
dynamic SQL.
Hmm, better watch it here. :-) Both he and I are programmers.
Though I'm not sure where dynamic SQL comes in to play here.
Frank
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "code" tables?
- From: David Cressey
- Re: "code" tables?
- From: Arved Sandstrom
- Re: "code" tables?
- References:
- "code" tables?
- From: Frank Swarbrick
- Re: "code" tables?
- From: Roy Hann
- "code" tables?
- Prev by Date: Re: "code" tables?
- Next by Date: Re: "code" tables?
- Previous by thread: Re: "code" tables?
- Next by thread: Re: "code" tables?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading