Re: WWW/Internet 2009: 2nd CFP until 21 September x
- From: rpost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (rpost)
- Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 20:11:08 +0000 (UTC)
Bob Badour wrote:
Walter wants a clue. If every table with null represented a materialized
outer join, as he claims he thinks it does, then presumably something is
being joined. Unnamed perhaps. Implicit for sure. But some ephemeral
tables or relations are joined (outer joined) to materialize the table.
Given a relation with a key K1, ... Kn and remaining attributes
L1, ... Lm, that relation is always the join of the m projections
on K1, ..., Kn, L1, ..., K1, ..., Kn, Lm. What Walter means is
that we can describe 'missing information' NULLs (not all NULLs,
mind you) as the result of allowing such projections to have
fewer rows than the full relation.
This describes tables with NULLs as shorthands
for sets of tables without any NULLs at all,
so it introduces in way that fits perfectly
into the relational model.
If you actually had a clue, rather than just pretending, you wouldn't
call these projections 'unnamed', 'implicit' or 'ephemeral'.
--
Reinier
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: WWW/Internet 2009: 2nd CFP until 21 September x
- From: Walter Mitty
- Re: WWW/Internet 2009: 2nd CFP until 21 September x
- References:
- WWW/Internet 2009: 2nd CFP until 21 September
- From: natty2006@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: WWW/Internet 2009: 2nd CFP until 21 September x
- From: Walter Mitty
- Re: WWW/Internet 2009: 2nd CFP until 21 September x
- From: paul c
- Re: WWW/Internet 2009: 2nd CFP until 21 September x
- From: Bob Badour
- WWW/Internet 2009: 2nd CFP until 21 September
- Prev by Date: Re: WWW/Internet 2009: 2nd CFP until 21 September
- Next by Date: Re: WWW/Internet 2009: 2nd CFP until 21 September x
- Previous by thread: Re: WWW/Internet 2009: 2nd CFP until 21 September x
- Next by thread: Re: WWW/Internet 2009: 2nd CFP until 21 September x
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading