comp.databases.theory

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Checking data consistency in the context of from-to-dimensions
  • From: Hans Mayr
• Re: Checking data consistency in the context of from-to-dimensions
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Checking data consistency in the context of from-to-dimensions
  • From: Philipp Post
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Joe Thurbon
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: none
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Checking data consistency in the context of from-to-dimensions
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Checking data consistency in the context of from-to-dimensions
  • From: Cimode
• Checking data consistency in the context of from-to-dimensions
  • From: Hans Mayr
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Joe Thurbon
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Tegiri Nenashi
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: none
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Is a function a relation?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: DBMS_Plumber
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Keith H Duggar
• Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Nilone
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Nilone
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Nilone
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Nilone
• Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation
  • From: --CELKO--
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: rpost
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: rpost
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Nilone
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Nilone
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: toby
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation
  • From: Christoph Rupp
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Nilone
• Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation
  • From: Walter Mitty
• AT&T Usenet Netnews Service Shutting Down
  • From: newsmaster
• Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation
  • From: Christoph Rupp
• Re: Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Nilone
• Question about SERIALIZE transaction isolation
  • From: Christoph Rupp
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: none
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Coul constraint *enforcement be done at compile time vs runtime ?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Cimode
• Working with idiots can kill you!
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: toby
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: toby
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Cimode
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Cimode
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Is this query optimized?
  • From: --CELKO--
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Cimode
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Cimode
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Cimode
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Cimode
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Cimode
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: Vadim Tropashko
• Re: Is this query optimized?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Is this query optimized?
  • From: toby
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Tegiri Nenashi
• Jan, please reply
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Is this query optimized?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Is this query optimized?
  • From: lawpoop
• Is this query optimized?
  • From: lawpoop
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Marshall
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: jaygarrick7
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Kevin Kirkpatrick
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Cimode
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Kevin Kirkpatrick
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: jaygarrick7
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: jaygarrick7
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: jaygarrick7
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: laugh of the day
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: laugh of the day
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: dr . coffee1
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• On specialization constraints time of application
  • From: Cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: dr . coffee1
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: David BL
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: none
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: none
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: none
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: none
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: dr . coffee1
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Tegiri Nenashi
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: paul c
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: dr . coffee1
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: dr . coffee1
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Jan Hidders
• Re: DEFAULT constraint?
  • From: Philipp Post
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: dr . coffee1
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: dr . coffee1
• Re: laugh of the day
  • From: cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Joe Thurbon
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: David BL
• Re: Logic and databases
  • From: Jonathan Leffler
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Joe Thurbon
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Kevin Kirkpatrick
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: none
• Re: laugh of the day
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: laugh of the day
  • From: cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: dr . coffee1
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: cimode
• Re: Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: vadimtro
• Object-oriented thinking in SQL context?
  • From: dr . coffee1
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Bernard Peek
• DEFAULT constraint?
  • From: Karsten Wutzke
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: David BL
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: David BL
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: David BL
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: none
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: none
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: vadimtro
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Marshall
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Marshall
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: JOG
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: JOG
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: Tegiri Nenashi
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: vadimtro
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: Marshall
• Re: Relation subset operators --> negation
  • From: vadimtro
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: vadimtro
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: paul c
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: paul c
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: David BL
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: paul c
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: paul c
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: David BL
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Joe Thurbon
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: David BL
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: JOG
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: David BL
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: JOG
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: JOG
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Tegiri Nenashi
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Kevin Kirkpatrick
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: --CELKO--
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: paul c
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: paul c
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: paul c
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: jefftyzzer
• laugh of the day
  • From: paul c
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: paul c
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: paul c
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: paul c
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: paul c
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: David BL
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: David BL
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: robur . 6
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: More on identifiers
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: How to make a binary tree in JSP?
  • From: Sabine Dinis Blochberger
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: robur . 6
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: JOG
• More on identifiers
  • From: David BL
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: Gene Wirchenko
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: Tegiri Nenashi
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: JOG
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: robur . 6
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: robur . 6
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: David BL
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: David BL
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: Tegiri Nenashi
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: robur . 6
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: --CELKO--
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: robur . 6
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: David BL
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: David BL
• Re: Relation subset operators
  • From: cimode
• Relation subset operators
  • From: Cimode
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: cimode
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: cimode
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• How to make a binary tree in JSP?
  • From: amit.chhodhary@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: David BL
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Kevin Kirkpatrick
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Kevin Kirkpatrick
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: rpost
• Re: Row-level security?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: Row-level security?
  • From: lawpoop
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Kevin Kirkpatrick
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys
  • From: David BL
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Logic and databases
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys
  • From: David BL
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: toby
• Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys
  • From: paul c
• Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys
  • From: David BL
• Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys
  • From: David BL
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Brian Selzer
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A silly analogy
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Row-level security?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys
  • From: David BL
• Re: Row-level security?
  • From: lawpoop
• Re: A silly analogy
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Row-level security?
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: A silly analogy
  • From: Roy Hann
• Re: Row-level security?
  • From: lawpoop
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Bernard Peek
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Bob Badour
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: paul c
• Re: ID field as logical address
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: A silly analogy
  • From: Walter Mitty
• Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys
  • From: paul c
• Re: Natural keys vs Aritficial Keys
  • From: David BL
• A silly analogy
  • From: Roy Hann

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Comp  > comp.databases.theory  > 2009-06